Proposal for Primary 1 Registration's Distance Criterion to Take Into Account Temporary Occupation Permit Date of Residence

Name and Constituency of Member of Parliament

Dr Choo Pei Ling, Chua Chu Kang GRC

Question

To ask the Minister for Education (a) whether the Ministry has reviewed whether the current Primary 1 registration framework for new residential developments should recognise the Temporary Occupation Permit (TOP) date, or other evidence of actual residence, instead of the Vacant Possession Date (VPD), when determining eligibility to use a residential address for home-school distance priority; and (b) if not, why not.

Name and Constituency of Member of Parliament

Ms Elysa Chen, Bishan-Toa Payoh GRC

Question

To ask the Minister for Education (a) what factors account for persistent oversubscription at certain primary schools in Bishan, relative to neighbouring estates; (b) whether the Ministry will review catchment boundaries or intake allocation in areas with sustained demand imbalance; and (c) what support does the Ministry offer to parents balloted out of their first choice.

Name and Constituency of Member of Parliament

Ms Gho Sze Kee, Mountbatten

Question

To ask the Minister for Education (a) whether the Ministry has a planning benchmark for what constitutes a reasonable travel time or distance between home and school for primary school pupils; and (b) what proportion of pupils in an area will be expected to have access to a primary school within that benchmark.

Name and Constituency of Member of Parliament

Ms Diana Pang Li Yen, Marine Parade-Braddell Heights GRC

Question

To ask the Minister for Education given that some primary schools may reduce Primary 1 intake despite rising demand from nearby new housing developments (a) what criteria does the Ministry use to determine or reduce school-level Primary 1 intake; and (b) how are local population density, projected school-age cohorts and the availability of alternative schools within 2 km considered in planning.

Response

1. As mentioned in an earlier PQ in July, MOE regularly reviews the provision of Primary One (P1) places, taking into account demographic trends and upcoming housing developments. MOE ensures that there are sufficient Primary 1 places for Singaporean children at both the national and regional levels.
2. Nevertheless, demand varies across schools depending on parents’ preferences. Some schools may be oversubscribed while neighbouring schools have vacancies. Parents who are unsuccessful in securing a place in their preferred school may participate in subsequent phase(s) they are eligible for. If a child remains unplaced after Phase 2C (Supplementary), MOE will post the child to a school within reasonable distance from home, subject to vacancies. Currently, around 98% of Singapore Citizen and Permanent Resident children obtain a place in a primary school of their choice or within 2km of their home. This has been stable over the past few years.
3. The Primary 1 intake for this year’s Primary 1 Registration Exercise was adjusted because the cohort entering Primary 1 in 2027 and in subsequent years is getting smaller. This is part of MOE's broader effort to manage the impact of falling school enrolment. If this is not done, more schools may need to be merged, and this will affect the accessibility and geographical spread of schools across Singapore. The adjustments also help to ensure that our schools have sufficient student enrolment to offer a meaningful range of learning opportunities and programmes for their students.
4. On the use of a new property address, the Vacant Possession Date (VPD) must be within two years of the child's entry into Primary 1. The child must reside in that address for at least 30 months, starting from the time the family moves into the new address. MOE uses the VPD because it is the legally binding commitment for delivery of possession by the developer, as indicated in the Sale and Purchase Agreement. MOE does not accept an expected Temporary Occupation Permit (TOP) date, as it is an estimated date by the developer that can be subject to change depending on construction progress. We continually review our policies, and will consider such feedback.