Home > Media Centre > Speeches Printer-friendly page  

Rear-Admiral Teo Chee Hean, Minister for Education's Keynote Address at the Second Malay Activity Executive Committee Co-ordinating Council (MESRA) National Education Seminar, Sat, 27 Dec 97


 

EDUCATIONAL OPPORTUNITIES

  1. Our education system is a sound one and of a high standard, with the necessary structures and mechanisms to help every child achieve his potential. These include streaming, and special help for low achievers as well as those in the gifted education programme.
  2. In the past decades, Singaporeans of all communities, including the Malay community, have benefited from the Government's emphasis on education and training, and its far-sighted policies. These include:
    1. Allowing every child to develop to his/her maximum potential.
    2. Providing ten years of school education and sufficient places in the ITE, polytechnics and universities for those who can benefit from further education.
    3. Providing a high quality of education with emphasis on instilling the values and skills needed to meet future challenges
    4. Staying at the forefront in innovations in the education field, like the use of IT.

 

ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT OF MALAY PUPILS

  1. One of the reasons for the success of the Malay community is the Government's open, transparent system based on competition and meritocracy. This policy encourages high standards of achievement, and has helped Malay pupils to move forward. Credit must also go to the good work done by the community self-help organisations MENDAKI and AMP.
  2. Results of Malay pupils at major national examinations have continued to improve:
    1. In the 1997 PSLE, 35% of the Malay pupils from the 1992 Primary One cohort qualified for the 4-year Special/Express course, up from 28% in 1990. (Table 1)
    2. In the GCE 'O' level, 26% of the Malay P1 cohort obtained 5 passes or more in 1996, slightly up from 25% in 1990. But this percentage seems to have reached a plateau. In Mathematics and Science, Malay pupils continue to make improvements. The percentage passing Mathematics has more than tripled in the last 16 years from 10% in 1980 to 35% in 1996, and the pass rate in Science has risen by two and a half times during the same period, from 12% to 30%. (Tables 2-4)
  3. The improvement in performance coupled with expansion in provision of post-secondary education opportunities has led to higher Malay participation in post-secondary education.
    1. In 1997, the percentage of Malay pupils who went on to post-secondary education (pre-university, polytechnics or ITE) was 46%, up from 32% in 1986. In other words, of the Malay pupils who entered P1 in 1987, nearly half went on beyond the first 10 years of general education. (Table 5)
    2. This year, 20% of the Malay P1 cohort made it to the polytechnics, up from less than 1% in 1980. At the university level, 3% of Malay pupils made it to NUS and NTU in 1997, up from 0.5% in 1980. (Tables 6-7)
  4. In terms of tertiary enrolment ratio (according to UN statistics), defined as the total enrolment in universities, polytechnics and colleges divided by population in the 19-23 age group, Singapore is much higher than its ASEAN neighbours. The enrolment ratio for Malay students is comparable to those in Malaysia and Indonesia. (Table 8)
  5. Malay pupils have also done well in the Third International Mathematics and Science Survey (TIMSS). This study compared representative samples of students in 45 countries. A total of half a million students in these 45 countries were tested. About 3,500 of our Malay students took part. If ranked separately as a group, our Malay students would have come up:
    1. 5th or 6th in Maths at the primary 3 and 4 level, doing better than students in countries like the US, Canada, England, New Zealand; and 4th or 5th at the secondary 1 and 2 level, behind only Korea, Japan and Hong Kong; (Table 9a)
    2. 13th or 14th in Science at the primary 3 and 4 level; and 6th or 7th at the secondary 1 and 2 level, almost the same as England. (Table 9b)
  6. The good performance of Malay Singaporeans in TIMSS shows that Malay pupils more than held their own in the international comparison, proving that they can succeed in an open, transparent and meritocratic system.

AREAS OF CONCERN

  1. While our Malay students have done well, there are four areas of concern. The aim is to raise awareness of these areas and to promote discussion with a view to finding solutions together so that the community can continue to do better.

Not Registering for Primary One

  1. Each year, about 500 or 5-6% of the Malay P1 cohort opts out of our conventional school system, compared to 1.5% of the Chinese and 4.5% of the Indians. These children miss out on the quality education that he or she would need to succeed - not just in terms of finding a good job, but more importantly, in integrating successfully into the social and economic system in Singapore, learning to cooperate and compete as part of the Singapore team in this rapidly changing world, in thinking critically, and learning how to be discerning about ideas and people. With a sizeable number of its children not even at the starting line, the Malay community would not be able to maximise the potential of its members, and keep pace with the progress of the other communities. (Table 10)

Dropout Rate

  1. Second, the dropout rate among Malay pupils is still high. Their dropout rate at the primary level is 1.1% as compared to 0.2% for the Chinese, and 0.9% for the Indians. At the secondary level, their dropout rate is 7.9%, compared to 3.8% for the Chinese, and 4.9% for the Indians. (Tables 11a &b)

5 'O' Level Passes

  1. Third, the percentage of Malay pupils with 5 or more 'O' level passes had risen rapidly then reached a plateau in the last 10 years whereas performance of the other ethnic groups continued to improve. A good 'O' level certificate is important so that many more Malay school leavers will be able to proceed to the next higher level of education, and take full advantage of the expansion in tertiary places in Singapore. This would strengthen the community's ability to produce future community and national leaders. (Table 2)

Mathematics and Science

  1. Fourth, despite having done better in Mathematics and Science at 'O' level, the gap in pass rates between our Malay students and the other ethnic groups remains. As the two subjects become more important in the world of IT in the next millennium, the young in the Malay community must have a strong foundation in Science and Mathematics in order to be well prepared for the jobs of the future. (Tables 3-4)

RISING TO THE CHALLENGE

  1. Rising to the challenge is a shared responsibility of the community and the Government. The Government can create the conditions to help, but in ways and at a pace which the community itself has to be comfortable with.

Support of Home Environment

  1. Support of the home environment is absolutely critical. The Community itself will need to increase its outreach to families to stress the importance of education for the future of their children. The self help groups MENDAKI and AMP have a major role to play in this. Studies, both local and overseas, show that close parental supervision and high parental expectation are the keys to academic success in schools.
    1. The San Diego County Office of Education reported that the research findings were overwhelmingly clear: when parents play a positive role in their children's education, children do better in schools. This is true whether parents are college-educated or grade school graduates and regardless of the family income, race, or ethnic background. What counts is that parents have a positive attitude about the importance of a good education and that they express confidence their children will succeed.
    2. Another study of the children of Indochinese refugees in inner city areas in the US reported that the key factor for their success in education was homework. The Indochinese children spent on average twice the time given to the task than non-Asian children. Homework was found to dominate household activities on school nights. Parents see to the chores after dinner, and remain on hand to watch and motivate, although, since they lack English skills and education, often do not participate directly.
    3. In 1994, the Association of Muslim Professionals (AMP) released the findings of a survey which showed that pupils from homes with higher parental involvement and greater availability of reading materials did better, after controlling for intrinsic ability. The greater availability of reading materials was in itself a reflection of the parents' attitude in providing for their children's educational development.
    4. Nur Dianah Jailani, the top Malay pupil in the 1997 PSLE had this to say about the role of parental support: "Arwah ayah saya selalu berpesan supaya berusaha dengan baik dalam apa jua perkara dan bersyukur dengan apa yang ada". ("My late father had always advised us to do the best we can in whatever we are doing and to be thankful for what is available")
  2. More Malay parents should encourage their children to aim high and give their children the support and supervision that they need to attain those goals. This should apply to both boys and girls. In Japan for example, many girls go on to college after completing high school. Even though they may stop work after getting married to raise a family, their strong educational foundation enables them to provide better guidance and support to their children, thus strengthening the next generation.

Greater Integration with Other Communities

  1. Malay students also need to be more closely integrated with students from the other communities. This will raise standards of achievement through greater peer pressure and competition, and by providing a more stimulating environment.

CONCLUSION

  1. Malay SIngaporeans like all Singaporeans have done well educationally. This is evidenced by the significant improvement in academic results at major national examinations and the fact that half of the Malay pupils went on to post-secondary education. In international comparisons, Malay pupils rank well in Mathematics and Science.
  2. This progress is due to the good education system in Singapore, and the efforts of self-help organisations and Malay parents in helping and encouraging Malay pupils to excel.
  3. However, there are four areas of concern. These must be overcome to allow the Malay community to make greater progress and generate more community and national leaders for the future.
  4. I am confident that with continued effort from the community working hand in hand with the Government and other Singaporeans, Malay students will be able to take full advantage of the excellent educational opportunities available, and be well prepared for the challenges of the 21st Century.



 

APPENDIX

Table 1: Percentage of P1 Cohort Eligible for Special/Express Course

Year

1980

1981

1982

1983

1984

1985

1986

1987

1988

1989

1990

1991

1992

1993

1994

1995

1996

1997

Chinese

54.3

52.9

55.5

57.2

58.8

58.1

61.0

60.3

59.8

61.5

59.1

61.2

62.5

65.3

66.4

68.1

67.5

67.5

Malay

30.2

26.4

29.1

29.5

29.3

28.0

28.5

27.6

26.3

29.3

28.2

30.7

32.8

34.4

35.4

37.5

37.4

34.9

Indian

34.1

34.9

34.1

36.1

36.0

35.4

36.9

34.1

34.4

34.3

34.6

36.7

37.3

40.2

39.7

44.6

44.4

41.7

Overall

48.8

47.4

50.0

51.7

52.9

52.5

54.8

54.1

53.9

55.2

53.1

55.1

55.8

58.3

59.1

60.7

60.0

59.3

 

 

Table 2: Percentage of P1 Cohort with at least 5 'O' Level Passes

Year

1980

1981

1982

1983

1984

1985

1986

1987

1988

1989

1990

1991

1992

1993

1994

1995

1996

Chinese

28.7

31.1

33.3

37.7

43.2

49.7

55.0

58.9

59.7

60.4

62.6

62.7

64.6

65.0

66.1

66.4

67.8

Malay

6.6

6.7

8.1

9.8

14.2

18.4

21.1

23.6

23.2

24.4

24.5

25.0

24.2

23.8

24.9

24.4

25.6

Indian

16.9

17.0

18.6

22.7

24.6

32.1

34.2

36.0

36.2

38.1

37.7

36.5

39.4

38.1

41.6

40.1

40.7

Overall

24.0

25.7

27.7

31.7

37.1

43.6

48.5

52.2

52.7

54.0

55.6

55.8

57.9

57.4

58.7

58.6

59.0

 

 

Table 3: Percentage of P1 Cohort Passing Mathematics at 'O' Level

Year

1980

1981

1982

1983

1984

1985

1986

1987

1988

1989

1990

1991

1992

1993

1994

1995

1996

Chinese

41.8

46.8

49.9

55.3

60.0

64.5

67.4

70.1

70.1

70.6

73.2

74.4

76.0

76.6

77.1

78.0

78.6

Malay

10.3

11.6

13.3

15.2

18.3

19.6

22.3

25.6

27.2

28.7

29.0

29.8

30.9

33.0

33.8

34.1

35.0

Indian

19.6

19.7

21.9

26.3

27.1

31.6

32.7

35.7

39.2

40.8

42.1

41.3

45.3

45.0

49.0

48.1

49.0

Overall

34.5

38.5

41.1

46.1

50.7

55.1

58.1

61.2

61.7

62.9

64.9

66.0

68.4

68.4

69.2

69.7

69.5

 

Table 4: Percentage of P1 Cohort Passing Science at 'O' Level

Year

1980

1981

1982

1983

1984

1985

1986

1987

1988

1989

1990

1991

1992

1993

1994

1995

1996

Chinese

36.8

38.5

39.7

43.5

45.9

49.5

53.6

57.1

59.7

62.5

66.0

68.3

70.2

71.4

72.0

73.4

73.9

Malay

12.2

12.9

14.6

16.0

17.2

17.0

17.6

19.7

20.1

23.5

23.3

25.2

25.0

27.3

29.0

28.9

29.5

Indian

24.4

25.1

26.2

30.0

28.1

29.2

29.0

30.8

33.5

36.8

38.0

39.8

42.8

42.9

45.6

45.3

45.3

Overall

31.5

33.0

34.3

37.7

39.9

42.9

46.5

49.9

52.1

55.5

58.1

60.5

62.8

63.4

64.2

65.1

64.7

 

Table 5: Percentage of P1 Cohort in Post-Secondary Education

(Pre-university, Polytechnic and ITE)

Year

1986

1987

1988

1989

1990

1991

1992

1993

1994

1995

1996

1997

Chinese

62.2

67.6

71.0

63.7

64.2

69.8

74.1

70.9

79.7

79.2

80.2

85.3

Malay

32.0

39.3

41.8

36.5

36.7

38.7

42.7

42.8

43.2

44.5

46.0

46.0

Indian

36.2

44.0

43.3

38.5

39.9

45.1

46.1

48.0

51.3

55.2

52.5

57.3

Overall

55.9

62.0

65.1

58.2

59.3

64.3

68.1

65.9

72.8

72.8

73.6

77.0

 

 

Table 6: Percentage of P1 Cohort Admitted to Polytechnics

Year

1980

1981

1982

1983

1984

1985

1986

1987

1988

1989

1990

1991

1992

1993

1994

1995

1996

1997

Chinese

7.0

7.2

8.5

12.3

16.9

17.0

16.3

20.0

18.7

20.1

22.4

26.8

32.3

32.7

39.4

40.8

41.6

43.9

Malay

0.8

0.7

0.7

1.1

2.6

4.2

3.8

5.3

5.5

7.4

8.4

9.4

11.9

13.3

15.3

18.6

20.9

20.2

Indian

0.8

1.3

1.5

1.7

3.3

4.3

3.5

4.3

4.0

5.9

7.6

10.2

12.3

15.8

18.5

25.2

23.8

26.0

Overall

5.4

5.6

6.6

9.4

13.3

14.0

13.5

16.7

15.8

17.3

19.6

23.4

28.2

29.3

34.7

36.8

37.6

38.9

 

Table 7: Percentage of P1 Cohort Admitted to NUS/NTU

Year

1980

1981

1982

1983

1984

1985

1986

1987

1988

1989

1990

1991

1992

1993

1994

1995

1996

1997

Chinese

5.9

6.2

7.0

7.8

8.5

9.5

11.2

12.7

15.9

16.2

17.4

16.4

17.9

20.0

22.0

21.4

24.9

24.2

Malay

0.5

0.8

1.0

1.3

1.4

1.6

1.9

1.8

2.5

2.9

2.9

2.7

2.9

3.1

3.2

3.4

3.7

3.0

Indian

3.5

3.1

3.9

4.1

4.8

5.4

5.7

6.1

6.4

7.7

8.0

6.6

7.6

8.5

8.7

9.3

10.2

10.0

Overall

4.9

5.1

5.8

6.5

7.1

7.9

9.2

10.5

13.2

13.7

14.7

13.8

15.2

17.0

18.5

18.4

21.1

20.4

Source: Ministry of Education


 

Table 8: Percentage of Age-Group Enrolled in Universities, Polytechnics and Colleges

Country

Tertiary Enrolment Ratio

SINGAPORE

35.2

Singapore Malays

10.0

MALAYSIA

9.6

INDONESIA

9.3

PHILIPPINES

26.8

THAILAND

20.6

BRUNEI

6.0

Source: UNESCO Yearbook 1996 (except figure for Singapore Malays).

Note:1. The tertiary enrolment ratio (TSR) is the total enrolment at the third level (university, polytechnics and colleges), regardless of age, divided by the population of the official age group which corresponds to that level of education. The age-group is 17-21 for Philippines, 18-22 for Thailand, and 19-23 for Singapore, Malaysia, Indonesia and Brunei.

2. The figure for Singapore is lower than the combined percentage of P1 cohort going to polytechnics and universities because our students spend only 3-4 years in the tertiary institutions, whereas the TSR figure is based on 5 years.

 

 

Table 9a: Third International Mathematics And Science Survey

(Ranking in Mathematics)

Primary

Secondary

1. Singapore 1. Singapore
2. Korea 2. Korea
3. Japan 3. Japan
4. Hong Kong 4. Hong Kong
5. Czech Republic Singapore (Malays)
Singapore (Malays) 5. Belgium (Fl)
6. Ireland 6. Czech Republic
7. United States 7. Slovak Republic
8. Canada 8. Switzerland
9. Scotland 9. France
10. England 10. Hungary
11. Cyprus 11. Russian Federation
12. Norway 12. Ireland
13. New Zealand 13. Canada
14. Greece 14. Sweden
15. Portugal 15. New Zealand
16. Iceland 16. England
17. Iran, Islamic Rep. 17. Norway
  18. United States
  19. Latvia (LSS)
  20. Spain
  21. Iceland
  22. Lithuania
  23. Cyprus
  24. Portugal
  25. Iran, Islamic Rep.

Source: Third International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS) by

the International Association for the Evaluation of Educational

Achievement (IEA) (except ranking of Singapore Malays).

Table 9b: Third International Mathematics And Science Survey

(Ranking in Science)

Primary

Secondary

1. Korea 1. Singapore
2. Japan 2. Czech Republic
3. United States 3. Japan
4. Czech Republic 4. Korea
5. England 5. Hungary
6. Canada 6. England
7 Singapore Singapore (Malays)
8. Ireland 7. Belgium (Fl)
9. Scotland 8. Slovak Republic
10. Hong Kong 9. Russian Federation
11. New Zealand 10. Ireland
12. Norway 11. Sweden
13. Iceland 12. United States
Singapore (Malays) 13. Canada
14. Greece 14. Norway
15. Portugal 15. New Zealand
16. Cyprus 16. Hong Kong
17. Iran, Islamic Rep. 17. Switzerland
  18. Spain
  19. France
  20. Iceland
  21. Latvia (LSS)
  22. Portugal
  23. Lithuania
  24. Iran, Islamic Rep.
  25. Cyprus

Source: Third International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS) by

the International Association for the Evaluation of Educational

Achievement (IEA) (except ranking of Singapore Malays).

 

 

Table 10: Number & Percentage of P1 Cohort who did not enrol in Government or Govt-Aided Schools

Year

1992

1993

1994

1995

1996

Chinese

376

353

398

574

503

 

(1.3%)

(1.4%)

(1.3%)

(1.5%)

(1.5%)

Malay

558

513

520

554

485

 

(7.4%)

(6.7%)

(6.4%)

(6.4%)

(5.2%)

Indian

184

181

194

204

174

 

(5.9%)

(5.7%)

(5.6%)

(5.4%)

(4.5%)

Overall

1279

1184

1261

1474

1305

 

(3.2%)

(3.2%)

(3.0%)

(2.8%)

(2.8%)

 

 

Table 11a: Dropout Rate of P1 Cohort in Primary School

Year

1982

1983

1984

1985

1986

1987

1988

1989

1990

1991

1992

1993

1994

1995

1996

Chinese

2.8

3.5

3.5

2.5

2.2

2.3

1.7

1.6

1.2

1.1

0.8

0.4

0.3

0.2

0.2

Malay

6.3

7.7

8.8

7.0

6.4

6.8

6.9

5.8

4.6

4.2

3.6

1.4

1.2

1.1

1.1

Indian

4.9

6.3

7.7

5.9

4.8

4.8

4.5

3.1

3.6

2.9

2.6

1.1

0.9

0.8

0.9

Overall

3.4

4.2

4.5

3.3

3.0

3.1

2.6

2.3

1.9

1.7

1.4

0.6

0.5

0.4

0.4

 

 

Table 11b: Dropout Rate of P1 Cohort in Secondary School

Year

1982

1983

1984

1985

1986

1987

1988

1989

1990

1991

1992

1993

1994

1995

1996

Chinese

4.6

3.5

4.1

3.0

2.9

3.5

3.6

3.4

3.5

3.3

3.6

2.3

2.7

3.3

3.8

Malay

6.0

5.6

6.5

4.0

4.3

5.6

7.5

7.1

7.7

6.6

7.6

4.5

5.4

6.7

7.9

Indian

3.5

3.2

4.5

3.1

3.2

3.7

5.4

6.4

5.1

5.3

5.6

3.1

3.7

4.2

4.9

Overall

4.7

3.8

4.4

3.2

3.1

3.8

4.3

4.1

4.2

3.9

4.3

2.6

3.2

3.9

4.6

Source: Ministry of Education



 
 

Page Last Updated : 02-Jan-2008

This site is best viewed with IE ver 5.x and Netscape ver 7.x
Copyright 2004 Ministry of Education. All rights reserved.
Privacy Statement | Terms of Use