![]() |
|
03401
10 August 2001
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS, SUSTAINED ACHIEVEMENT AWARDS and BEST PRACTICE AWARDS FOR SECONDARY SCHOOLS 2001
1. As in previous years, the Ministry of Education is providing information on the performance of Secondary Schools to help pupils and their parents make informed choices when opting for Secondary Schools. The performance indicators for Secondary Schools highlight the top-ranking schools in the General Certificate of Education (GCE) 'O' Level Examination, both in terms of absolute as well as value-added performance1. The schools awarded The Sustained Achievement Awards and The Best Practice Awards are also highlighted.
Top Schools based on Absolute Performance
2. In the Special/Express course category, the top five schools were Raffles Institution, Raffles Girls' (Sec), Nanyang Girls' High, The Chinese High and Dunman High. The best non-Independent and non-Autonomous schools were Tanjong Katong Secondary, ranked 25th, Paya Lebar Methodist Girls’, ranked 26th and Ngee Ann Secondary, ranked 27th.
3. For the Normal course, the top five Secondary Schools were Clementi Town Secondary, Xinmin Secondary, Ngee Ann Secondary, Presbyterian High and Anderson Secondary.
4. The top schools in the 2000 GCE 'O' Level Examination are listed in Tables 1 and 2.
High Value-added Schools
5. This year, CHIJ St. Theresa's Convent, Kuo Chuan Presbyterian Secondary, Ngee Ann Secondary, Paya Lebar Methodist Girls' Secondary, Queensway Secondary, St. Anthony's Canossian Secondary and Xinmin Secondary qualified for awards in both the Special/Express and Normal courses.
6. The high value-added Secondary Schools are shown in Tables 3 and 4. These schools have helped their pupils perform better than expected based on their PSLE scores. The Ministry will award $20,000 to each of the top 10 schools and $10,000 to each of the next 10 schools in recognition of their good efforts.
Top Schools in Fitness
7. Based on the composite Fitness Index, the top 5 schools in 2000 were CHIJ St. Nicholas Girls', Raffles Girls' (Secondary), Singapore Chinese Girls' School, Cedar Girls' Secondary and Nanyang Girls' High.
8. The top 50 schools in terms of pupils' physical fitness, lowest percentage overweight and Fitness Index are shown in Tables 5, 6 and 7. These indicators are based on all pupils in the school and not just those in the graduating classes.
Sustained Achievement Awards (SAAs)
9. The Sustained Achievement Awards (SAAs) gives recognition to schools that have performed well consistently over a period of years, in academic and non-academic areas.
10. This year, a total of 50 SAAs, 8 for Sports, 20 for Uniformed Group, 7 for Academic Value-added and 15 for Physical Fitness, will be given out to 38 Secondary Schools. This is an increase of 4 awards and 9 schools over the previous year.
11. Of the winning schools this year, 9 will receive the SAA for the first time. They are Anglo-Chinese (Barker Road) for Sports, Cedar Girls' Secondary, Crescent Girls', Hong Kah Secondary, New Town Secondary and Presbyterian High for Uniformed Group activities, Queensway Secondary for Academic Value-added performance, Cedar Girls' Secondary, Crescent Girls', Mayflower Secondary and Temasek Secondary for Physical Fitness.The details are given in Table 8.
Best Practice Awards (BPAs)
12. This year, the Ministry of Education will be giving out the Best Practice Awards for the first time. The Best Practice Awards (BPAs) give recognition to schools with effective practices and systems that lead to desirable educational outcomes, academic or otherwise. The awards are part of the implementation of the School Excellence Model which provides a holistic approach to managing education with equal emphasis on processes as well as results.
13. There are 4 categories of BPA. They represent the Ministry of Education's expectations of schools and reflect the key areas in the School Excellence Model (refer to Information Sheet on BPA). They are:
| a) | Organisational Effectiveness | |
| b) | Student All-round Development | |
| c) | Staff Well-being | |
| d) | Teaching and Learning |
14. This year, 5 Secondary Schools will receive 7 BPAs. They are Anglo-Chinese (Independent), Paya Lebar Methodist Girls' Secondary, Raffles Institution, River Valley High and Xinmin Secondary. The details are given in Table 9.
|
Table 1: Top 50 Schools for Special/Express Course |
|
Rank |
SCHOOL |
2000 GCE O-LEVEL RESULTS |
PSLE SCORES OF 2001 |
||||||
| No. of Pupils | Mean L1B5 | Mean Subject Grade |
% Passed 5 O-Levels or More |
From Non-Affiliated Schools | From Affiliated Schools | ||||
| Special Course | Express Course | Special Course | Express Course | ||||||
| 1 | Raffles Institution | 463 | 7.9 | 1.6 | 100 | 261-286 | |||
| 2 | Raffles Girls' (Secondary) | 470 | 8.3 | 1.8 | 100 | 266-288 | |||
| 3 | Nanyang Girls' High | 308 | 8.6 | 1.7 | 100 | 262-286 | 251-267 | 249-252 | |
| 4 | The Chinese High | 479 | 9.0 | 1.9 | 100 | 261-287 | |||
| 5 | Dunman High | 406 | 9.6 | 2.0 | 100 | 259-288 | |||
| 6 | River Valley High | 439 | 10.0 | 2.1 | 100 | 255-281 | |||
| 7 | CHIJ St. Nicholas Girls' | 375 | 10.1 | 2.1 | 100 | 258-286 | 251-269 | 222-252 | |
| 8 | Methodist Girls' (Secondary) | 276 | 10.9 | 2.2 | 100 | 256-274 | 202-283 | ||
| 8 | Singapore Chinese Girls' | 241 | 10.9 | 2.2 | 100 | 256-277 | 202-277 | ||
| 10 | Anglo-Chinese (Independent) | 437 | 11.5 | 2.3 | 100 | 247-270 | 240-280 | ||
| 11 | Anderson Secondary | 246 | 12.0 | 2.3 | 100 | 253-275 | |||
| 12 | Cedar Girls' Secondary | 358 | 12.2 | 2.5 | 99 | 241-273 | |||
| 12 | Victoria | 352 | 12.2 | 2.4 | 100 | 243-280 | |||
| 14 | Tanjong Katong Girls'i | 350 | 12.4 | 2.4 | 99 | 238-268 | |||
| 15 | Bukit Panjang Govt. High | 260 | 12.7 | 2.5 | 100 | 246-267 | |||
| 16 | St. Joseph's Institution | 383 | 12.8 | 2.5 | 100 | 239-269 | 228-271 | ||
| 17 | Crescent Girls' | 346 | 13.1 | 2.5 | 99 | 236-271 | |||
| 17 | Xinmin Secondary | 214 | 13.1 | 2.4 | 100 | 237-261 | |||
| 19 | Commonwealth Secondary | 204 | 13.2 | 2.5 | 98 | 241-267 | |||
| 19 | Zhonghua Secondary | 140 | 13.2 | 2.5 | 99 | 241-256 | |||
| 21 | Anglican High | 372 | 13.3 | 2.6 | 99 | 251-277 | |||
| 22 | Catholic High | 340 | 13.5 | 2.7 | 99 | 250-268 | 242-252 | 250-272 | 224-251 |
| 23 | Chung Cheng High (Main) | 360 | 13.8 | 2.7 | 99 | 250-264 | 241-252 | ||
| 24 | Temasek Secondary | 230 | 13.9 | 2.6 | 100 | 241-276 | |||
| 25 | Tanjong Katong Secondary | 332 | 14.3 | 2.6 | 99 | 231-270 | |||
| 26 | Paya Lebar Methodist Girls' Secondary | 228 | 14.4 | 2.8 | 99 | 195-271 | |||
| 27 | Maris Stella High | 291 | 15.2 | 2.9 | 98 | 250-260 | 224-251 | 250-265 | 224-250 |
| 27 | Ngee Ann Secondary | 258 | 15.2 | 2.9 | 95 | 235-265 | 188-260 | ||
| 29 | Nan Hua Secondary | 163 | 15.3 | 2.8 | 99 | 250-272 | 243-252 | ||
| 30 | Ang Mo Kio Secondary | 194 | 15.4 | 3.0 | 96 | 233-252 | |||
| 31 | CHIJ Secondary (Toa Payoh) | 307 | 16.1 | 3.1 | 96 | 247-260 | 188-258 | ||
| 32 | Clementi Town Secondary | 188 | 16.2 | 3.0 | 97 | 232-255 | |||
| 33 | Fairfield Methodist Secondary | 216 | 16.4 | 3.1 | 96 | 237-254 | 189-264 | ||
| 34 | St. Andrew's Secondary | 211 | 16.5 | 3.0 | 98 | 230-245 | 188-283 | ||
| 35 | Swiss Cottage Secondary | 233 | 16.8 | 3.2 | 96 | 238-264 | |||
| 36 | Dunman Secondary | 228 | 17.4 | 3.2 | 94 | 232-267 | |||
| 37 | Ahmad Ibrahim Secondary | 266 | 17.5 | 3.3 | 93 | 237-256 | |||
| 38 | St. Anthony's Canossian Secondary | 202 | 18.0 | 3.3 | 95 | 235-247 | 188-265 | ||
| 39 | CHIJ Katong Convent | 149 | 18.1 | 3.6 | 95 | 195-260 | |||
| 39 | Geylang Methodist Secondary | 205 | 18.1 | 3.2 | 95 | 226-259 | 188-244 | ||
| 41 | Presbyterian High | 198 | 18.2 | 3.3 | 95 | 228-262 | |||
| 42 | Gan Eng Seng | 181 | 18.4 | 3.4 | 95 | 228-258 | |||
| 42 | Kuo Chuan Presbyterian Secondary | 128 | 18.4 | 3.3 | 95 | 228-247 | 189-248 | ||
| 42 | St. Margaret's Secondary | 132 | 18.4 | 3.3 | 92 | 235-255 | 188-251 | ||
| 45 | Montfort Secondary | 154 | 18.5 | 3.5 | 92 | 188-262 | |||
| 45 | St. Gabriel's Secondary | 162 | 18.5 | 3.3 | 94 | 231-238 | 188-241 | ||
| 47 | CHIJ St. Theresa's Convent | 190 | 18.6 | 3.4 | 93 | 211-239 | 189-233 | ||
| 48 | Beatty Secondary | 209 | 19.0 | 3.4 | 93 | 224-251 | |||
| 48 | Jurong Secondary | 238 | 19.0 | 3.5 | 95 | 225-249 | |||
| 50 | Bukit Batok Secondary | 206 | 19.2 | 3.5 | 95 | 224-257 | |||
|
Table 2: Top 40 Schools for Normal Course |
| Rank |
SCHOOL |
2000 GCE O-LEVEL RESULTS |
% S4N Eligible for S5N |
PSLE SCORES OF 2001 SEC 1 INTAKE |
|||||
| No. of Pupils | Mean L1B4 | Mean Subject Grade | % Passed 5 O-Levels or More |
% Passed 3 O-Levels or More | From Non- Affiliated Schools | From Affiliated Schools | |||
| 1 | Clementi Town Secondary | 53 | 18.4 | 4.2 | 72 | 96 | 88 | 178-199 | |
| 1 | Xinmin Secondary | 65 | 18.4 | 4.0 | 86 | 98 | 97 | 184-198 | |
| 3 | Ngee Ann Secondary | 100 | 20.6 | 4.5 | 63 | 91 | 93 | 186-198 |
152-187 |
| 4 | Presbyterian High | 63 | 20.7 | 4.5 | 60 | 94 | 76 | 171-189 | |
| 5 | Anderson Secondary | 40 | 21.0 | 4.7 | 65 | 80 | 100 | 186-198 | |
| 6 | Paya Lebar Methodist Girls' Secondary | 43 | 21.3 | 4.9 | 84 | 93 | 100 | 171-196 | |
| 7 | Nan Hua Secondary | 59 | 21.4 | 4.6 | 66 | 92 | 82 | ||
| 8 | Kuo Chuan Presbyterian Secondary | 52 | 22.2 | 4.8 | 67 | 88 | 84 | 183-197 | 152-187 |
| 8 | St. Anthony's Canossian Secondary | 65 | 22.2 | 4.9 | 71 | 89 | 92 | 152-187 | |
| 10 | Boon Lay Secondary | 96 | 22.4 | 4.9 | 59 | 88 | 89 | 172-187 | |
| 11 | Holy Innocents' High | 84 | 22.5 | 4.8 | 51 | 89 | 98 | 179-198 | 160-187 |
| 12 | Geylang Methodist Secondary | 72 | 22.8 | 4.8 | 54 | 88 | 91 | 185-187 | 152-186 |
| 13 | CHIJ St. Theresa's Convent | 67 | 23.0 | 5.1 | 66 | 85 | 97 | 173-194 | 153-187 |
| 14 | Dunman Secondary | 110 | 23.1 | 5.2 | 60 | 83 | 93 | 185-199 | |
| 15 | Bukit View Secondary | 41 | 23.4 | 5.1 | 37 | 88 | 81 | 155-187 | |
| 15 | Yishun Town Secondary | 64 | 23.4 | 4.9 | 56 | 81 | 81 | 176-193 | |
| 17 | Ang Mo Kio Secondary | 62 | 23.5 | 5.1 | 56 | 87 | 88 | 172-193 | |
| 18 | Beatty Secondary | 90 | 23.7 | 5.0 | 53 | 86 | 78 | 177-196 | |
| 18 | Mayflower Secondary | 47 | 23.7 | 5.2 | 55 | 91 | 82 | 176-196 | |
| 20 | Damai Secondary | 67 | 23.8 | 5.2 | 55 | 82 | 86 | 179-195 | |
| 20 | Kranji Secondary | 71 | 23.8 | 5.2 | 51 | 80 | 69 | 178-194 | |
| 22 | Manjusri Secondary | 58 | 23.9 | 5.2 | 50 | 78 | 81 | 156-186 | 152-184 |
| 23 | Bedok View Secondary | 66 | 24.2 | 5.2 | 47 | 80 | 87 | 174-187 | |
| 23 | Chung Cheng High (Branch) | 63 | 24.2 | 5.2 | 49 | 83 | 91 | 168-187 | |
| 25 | Hai Sing Catholic | 96 | 24.3 | 5.3 | 50 | 82 | 83 | 180-198 | |
| 26 | Serangoon Garden Secondary | 80 | 24.5 | 5.2 | 49 | 83 | 67 | 152-184 | |
| 27 | St Patrick's | 59 | 24.6 | 5.3 | 29 | 90 | 86 | 153-187 | |
| 28 | Peicai Secondary | 62 | 24.7 | 5.4 | 50 | 68 | 77 | 163-185 | |
| 29 | Macpherson Secondary | 61 | 24.8 | 5.3 | 38 | 85 | 78 | 152-187 | |
| 29 | St. Andrew's Secondary | 65 | 24.8 | 5.4 | 45 | 77 | 82 | 182-198 | 152-187 |
| 31 | Jurong Secondary | 90 | 24.9 | 5.3 | 51 | 84 | 87 | 178-198 | |
| 32 | Queensway Secondary | 60 | 25.0 | 5.3 | 38 | 88 | 75 | 166-187 | |
| 32 | Yio Chu Kang Secondary | 45 | 25.0 | 5.3 | 42 | 82 | 52 | 152-182 | |
| 34 | Bukit Batok Secondary | 112 | 25.1 | 5.3 | 42 | 76 | 76 | 172-194 | |
| 34 | Deyi Secondary | 85 | 25.1 | 5.4 | 44 | 75 | 85 | 169-187 | |
| 34 | Woodsville Secondary | 53 | 25.1 | 5.6 | 42 | 83 | 89 | 152-184 | |
| 37 | Guangyang Secondary | 57 | 25.2 | 5.4 | 39 | 75 | 75 | 153-187 | |
| 37 | Pasir Ris Secondary | 107 | 25.2 | 5.3 | 41 | 73 | 87 | 178-188 | |
| 37 | Riverside Secondary | 87 | 25.2 | 5.3 | 46 | 76 | 76 | 172-192 | |
| 40 | Gan Eng Seng | 66 | 25.4 | 5.4 | 35 | 82 | 83 | 180-199 | |
| 40 | Woodlands Secondary | 61 | 25.4 | 5.5 | 41 | 69 | 81 | 160-199 | |
|
Table 3: Top 20 Value-Added Secondary Schools for Special/Express Course |
|
SCHOOL |
PSLE SCORES OF 2001 |
||
| From Non-Affiliated Schools | From Affiliated Schools |
||
|
Top 10 Value-Added Schools |
Bedok North Secondary | 190-243 | |
| CHIJ Katong Convent | 195-260 | ||
| CHIJ St. Theresa's Convent | 211-239 | 189-233 | |
| First Toa Payoh Secondary | 188-236 | ||
| Kuo Chuan Presbyterian Secondary | 228-247 | 189-242 | |
| Methodist Girls' (Secondary) | 256-274 | 202-283 | |
| Paya Lebar Methodist Girls' Secondary | 195-271 | ||
| Singapore Chinese Girls' | 256-277 | 202-277 | |
| St. Anthony's Canossian Secondary | 235-247 | 188-265 | |
| Xinmin Secondary | 237-261 | ||
|
Next Top 10 |
Anglo-Chinese (Barker Road) | 195-242 | |
| Bedok South Secondary | 188-236 | ||
| Ngee Ann Secondary | 235-265 | 188-260 | |
| Outram Secondary | 195-234 | ||
| Queensway Secondary | 203-236 | ||
| Serangoon Garden Technical | 188-248 | ||
| St. Andrew's Secondary | 230-245 | 188-283 | |
| St. Gabriel's Secondary | 231-238 | 188-241 | |
| St. Margaret's Secondary | 235-255 | 188-245 | |
| Tanjong Katong Secondary | 231-270 | ||
|
Table 4: Top 20 Value-Added Secondary Schools for Normal Course |
|
SCHOOL |
PSLE SCORES OF 2001 SEC 1 INTAKE |
||
| From Non-Affiliated Schools |
From Affiliated Schools |
||
|
Top 10 |
Bukit View Secondary | 155-187 | |
| Clementi Town Secondary | 178-199 | ||
| CHIJ St. Theresa's Convent | 173-194 | 153-187 | |
| Kuo Chuan Presbyterian Secondary | 183-197 | 152-187 | |
| Nan Hua Secondary | |||
| Ngee Ann Secondary | 186-198 | 152-187 | |
| Paya Lebar Methodist Girls' Secondary | 171-196 | ||
| Presbyterian High | 171-189 | ||
| St. Anthony's Canossian Secondary | 152-187 | ||
| Xinmin Secondary | 184-198 | ||
|
Next Top 10 |
Anderson Secondary | 186-198 | |
| Boon Lay Secondary | 172-187 | ||
| Bukit Batok Secondary | 172-194 | ||
| Geylang Methodist Secondary | 185-187 | 152-186 | |
| Holy Innocents' High | 179-198 | 160-187 | |
| Kranji Secondary | 178-194 | ||
| MacPherson Secondary | 152-187 | ||
| Peicai Secondary | 163-185 | ||
| Queensway Secondary | 166-187 | ||
| Serangoon Garden Secondary | 152-184 | ||
|
Table 5: Top 50 Schools By Physical Fitness Level In 2000 |
| S/No |
School |
Percentage with Awards |
| 1 | CHIJ St. Nicholas Girls' School | 99.2 |
| 2 | Singapore Chinese Girls' School | 98.1 |
| 3 | Nanyang Girls' High School | 96.1 |
| 4 | Cedar Girls' Secondary School | 95.6 |
| 5 | Tanjong Katong Girls' School | 95.5 |
| 6 | Raffles Girls' School (Secondary) | 95.3 |
| 7 | Crescent Girls' School | 95.0 |
| 8 | CHIJ St. Joseph's Convent | 92.4 |
| 9 | Dunman High School | 90.9 |
| 10 | Methodist Girls' School (Secondary) | 90.7 |
| 11 | Evergreen Secondary School | 89.5 |
| 11 | Anglican High School | 89.5 |
| 13 | Fuhua Secondary School | 89.1 |
| 14 | Commonwealth Secondary School | 88.4 |
| 15 | Anderson Secondary School | 86.8 |
| 16 | Temasek Secondary School | 86.4 |
| 17 | Serangoon Garden Technical School | 86.0 |
| 18 | New Town Secondary School | 85.6 |
| 19 | Kranji Secondary School | 85.4 |
| 20 | Hai Sing Catholic School | 84.6 |
| 20 | St. Anthony's Canossian Secondary School | 84.6 |
| 22 | Holy Innocents' High School | 84.5 |
| 22 | Balestier Hill Secondary School | 84.5 |
| 24 | Bukit Panjang Govt. High School | 84.3 |
| 25 | Mayflower Secondary School | 84.1 |
| 25 | Nan Chiau High School | 84.1 |
| 25 | Queenstown Secondary School | 84.1 |
| 28 | First Toa Payoh Secondary School | 84.0 |
| 29 | CHIJ St. Theresa's Convent | 83.7 |
| 30 | CHIJ Katong Convent | 83.6 |
| 31 | Orchid Park Secondary School | 83.4 |
| 32 | Yuying Secondary School | 83.2 |
| 32 | Jurong Secondary School | 83.2 |
| 34 | Northbrooks Secondary School | 83.1 |
| 35 | Thomson Secondary School | 83.0 |
| 36 | Pasir Ris Crest Secondary School | 82.9 |
| 37 | Woodgrove Secondary School | 82.8 |
| 38 | Bukit View Secondary School | 82.1 |
| 39 | Chung Cheng High School (Main) | 81.8 |
| 40 | Woodlands Secondary School | 81.5 |
| 40 | Raffles Institution | 81.5 |
| 42 | Anglo-Chinese School (Barker Road) | 81.1 |
| 43 | Queensway Secondary School | 80.9 |
| 44 | Compassvale Secondary School | 80.8 |
| 45 | Xinmin Secondary School | 80.4 |
| 46 | River Valley High School | 80.0 |
| 46 | Rangoon Secondary School | 80.0 |
| 48 | Paya Lebar Methodist Girls' Secondary School | 79.9 |
| 49 | Bedok North Secondary School | 79.7 |
| 50 | Shuqun Secondary School | 79.6 |
|
Table 6: The 50 Schools With Lowest Percentage Overweight in 2000 |
| S/No | Name |
Percentage Overweight |
| 1 | Dunman High School | 5.5 |
| 2 | Crescent Girls' School | 5.9 |
| 2 | Nanyang Girls' High School | 5.9 |
| 4 | Cedar Girls' Secondary School | 6.2 |
| 5 | Mayflower Secondary School | 6.4 |
| 6 | Anglican High School | 6.6 |
| 7 | Bukit Panjang Govt. High School | 6.7 |
| 8 | River Valley High School | 6.9 |
| 9 | Raffles Institution | 7.1 |
| 10 | Rangoon Secondary School | 7.4 |
| 10 | Tanjong Katong Girls' School | 7.4 |
| 12 | CHIJ St. Nicholas Girls' School | 7.5 |
| 12 | Victoria School | 7.5 |
| 12 | Upper Serangoon Secondary School | 7.5 |
| 15 | Temasek Secondary School | 7.6 |
| 15 | Zhonghua Secondary School | 7.6 |
| 17 | Fuhua Secondary School | 7.7 |
| 18 | Queenstown Secondary School | 7.8 |
| 18 | Anglo-Chinese School (Independent) | 7.8 |
| 18 | The Chinese High School | 7.8 |
| 18 | Serangoon Garden Technical School | 7.8 |
| 18 | Singapore Chinese Girls' School | 7.8 |
| 18 | Canberra Secondary School | 7.8 |
| 24 | Chung Cheng High School (Main) | 7.9 |
| 24 | Anderson Secondary School | 7.9 |
| 24 | Evergreen Secondary School | 7.9 |
| 24 | Holy Innocents' High School | 7.9 |
| 28 | Methodist Girls' School (Secondary) | 8.0 |
| 28 | New Town Secondary School | 8.0 |
| 30 | Nan Hua Secondary School | 8.2 |
| 31 | Raffles Girls' School (Secondary) | 8.4 |
| 31 | Pei Dao Secondary School | 8.4 |
| 33 | Ngee Ann Secondary School | 8.6 |
| 33 | Delta Secondary School | 8.6 |
| 35 | Thomson Secondary School | 8.7 |
| 36 | Kuo Chuan Presbyterian Secondary School | 8.8 |
| 37 | Northland Secondary School | 8.9 |
| 38 | Yuying Secondary School | 9.0 |
| 39 | Fairfield Methodist Secondary School | 9.3 |
| 39 | Tanjong Katong Secondary School | 9.3 |
| 39 | Catholic High School | 9.3 |
| 42 | Teck Whye Secondary School | 9.4 |
| 42 | St. Hilda's Secondary School | 9.4 |
| 42 | Dunman Secondary School | 9.4 |
| 45 | Xinmin Secondary School | 9.5 |
| 46 | Greenview Secondary School | 9.6 |
| 47 | Whitley Secondary School | 9.7 |
| 47 | Hua Yi Secondary School | 9.7 |
| 47 | Fajar Secondary School | 9.7 |
| 47 | Pioneer Secondary School | 9.7 |
|
Table 7: Top 50 Schools By Fitness Index in 2000 |
|
S/No |
Name |
Fitness Index |
| 1 |
CHIJ St. Nicholas Girls' School |
94.5 |
| 2 | Raffles Girls' School (Secondary) | 92.2 |
| 2 | Singapore Chinese Girls' School | 92.2 |
| 4 | Cedar Girls' Secondary School | 92.0 |
| 5 | Nanyang Girls' High School | 91.9 |
| 6 | Crescent Girls' School | 91.0 |
| 7 | Tanjong Katong Girls' School | 90.9 |
| 8 | Methodist Girls' School (Secondary) | 89.8 |
| 9 | Dunman High School | 89.7 |
| 10 | Fuhua Secondary School | 88.1 |
| 11 | Evergreen Secondary School | 88.0 |
| 12 | CHIJ St. Joseph's Convent | 87.6 |
| 13 | Bukit Panjang Govt. High School | 86.9 |
| 13 | Anglican High School | 86.9 |
| 15 | Temasek Secondary School | 86.8 |
| 16 | Mayflower Secondary School | 86.6 |
| 17 | Serangoon Garden Technical School | 86.4 |
| 18 | New Town Secondary School | 85.6 |
| 19 | St. Anthony's Canossian Secondary School | 85.4 |
| 20 | First Toa Payoh Secondary School | 85.1 |
| 21 | Anderson Secondary School | 85.0 |
| 22 | Chung Cheng High School (Main) | 84.6 |
| 23 | Holy Innocents' High School | 84.5 |
| 24 | Rangoon Secondary School | 84.3 |
| 25 | Queenstown Secondary School | 84.2 |
| 25 | Yuying Secondary School | 84.2 |
| 27 | River Valley High School | 84.0 |
| 28 | Commonwealth Secondary School | 83.9 |
| 29 | CHIJ Katong Convent | 83.7 |
| 30 | Raffles Institution | 83.5 |
| 31 | Balestier Hill Secondary School | 83.4 |
| 32 | Hai Sing Catholic School | 83.2 |
| 32 | CHIJ St. Theresa's Convent | 83.2 |
| 34 | Nan Chiau High School | 83.0 |
| 35 | Kranji Secondary School | 82.9 |
| 36 | Anglo-Chinese School (Independent) | 82.8 |
| 36 | Pei Dao Secondary School | 82.8 |
| 38 | Tanjong Katong Secondary School | 82.4 |
| 39 | Hua Yi Secondary School | 82.1 |
| 40 | Paya Lebar Methodist Girls' Secondary School | 82.0 |
| 40 | Yishun Town Secondary School | 82.0 |
| 42 | Woodlands Secondary School | 81.9 |
| 43 | The Chinese High School | 81.8 |
| 44 | Sembawang Secondary School | 81.7 |
| 44 | St. Margaret's Secondary School | 81.7 |
| 46 | CHIJ Secondary (Toa Payoh) | 81.6 |
| 47 | Shuqun Secondary School | 81.3 |
| 48 | Greenridge Secondary School | 81.0 |
| 49 | Bukit View Secondary School | 80.9 |
| 49 | Pasir Ris Crest Secondary School | 80.9 |
APPENDIX
Explanatory Notes For Tables On Ranking Of Secondary Schools
1 The following seven tables provide information on the performance of selected Secondary Schools in the 2000 GCE O-level examination and the top schools in Physical Fitness, Lowest Percentage Overweight and Fitness Index.
| Table 1: Top 50 Schools (Special/Express Course) Table 2: Top 40 Schools (Normal Course) Table 3: Top 20 Value-Added Schools (Special/Express Course) Table 4: Top 20 Value-Added Schools (Normal Course) Table 5: Top 50 Secondary Schools by Physical Fitness Level Table 6: The 50 Secondary Schools with Lowest Percentage Overweight Table 7: Top 50 Secondary Schools by Fitness Index |
2 For Tables 1-4, the performance of each school is based on pupils who took the O-level examination for the first time. Schools not included in the tables are those with small candidature (fewer than 40 pupils) or those closed in 2001. Not included in the ranking exercise are the following schools:
| Schools With Small Candidature |
Anglo-Chinese (Barker Road) (Normal) Balestier Hill Secondary (Normal) Broadrick Secondary (Normal) Bukit Merah Secondary (Normal) Bukit Panjang Govt. High (Normal) Buona Vista Secondary (Normal) Chai Chee Secondary (Normal) Chestnut Drive Secondary (Normal) CHIJ Secondary (Toa Payoh) (Normal) CHIJ Katong Convent (Normal) CHIJ St. Joseph's Convent (Normal) Christ Church Secondary (Express, Normal) Commonwealth Secondary (Normal) Fairfield Methodist Secondary (Normal) Fajar Secondary (Normal) First Toa Payoh Secondary (Normal) Ghim Moh Secondary (Normal) Nan Chiau High (Normal) Outram Secondary (Normal) Pei Dao Secondary (Normal) Rangoon Secondary (Express, Normal) Serangoon Garden Technical (Normal) Shuqun Secondary (Normal) Si Ling Secondary (Normal) Siglap Secondary (Normal) St. Margaret's Secondary (Normal) St. Thomas Secondary (Normal) Teck Whye Secondary (Normal) Telok Kurau Secondary (Normal) Temasek Secondary (Normal) Thomson Secondary (Normal) Upper Serangoon Secondary (Express) Yuan Ching Secondary (Normal) Yusof Ishak Secondary (Normal) Zhonghua Secondary (Normal) |
| New Schools Without Any O-Level Candidates in 2000 | Canberra Secondary Compassvale Secondary Coral Secondary East Spring Secondary Evergreen Secondary Fuhua Secondary Hua Yi Secondary Junyuan Secondary Kent Ridge Secondary Marsiling Secondary Northbrooks Secondary Orchid Park Secondary Pasir Ris Crest Secondary Regent Secondary Sembawang Secondary Seng Kang Secondary Unity Secondary Westwood Secondary Woodgrove Secondary Woodlands Ring Secondary Zhenghua Secondary |
| Schools Not Admitting Secondary 1 students in 2001 | Christ Church Secondary |
| Schools Merged / Closed in 2001 | Buona Vista Secondary Rangoon Secondary St. Thomas Secondary |
Description of Terms Used in Tables
3 Number of Pupils: This column shows the number of pupils who took the O-level examination for the first time.
4 Mean L1B5: Mean of pupils' aggregate grades in L1 (English or Higher Mother Tongue language) and best 5 subjects. This is the ranking criterion for Special/Express course.
5 Mean L1B4: Mean of pupils' aggregate grades in English and best 4 subjects. This is the ranking criterion for Normal course.
6 Mean Subject Grade (MSG): Mean of all grades obtained by pupils in a school. This is the old ranking criterion for Special/Express and Normal course.
7 % Passed 5 O-Levels or More: Percentage of pupils with 5 O-level passes or more.
8 % Passes 3 O-Levels or More: Percentage of pupils with 3 O-level passes or more.
9 PSLE Scores of 2001 Sec 1 Intake: Aggregate scores of Sec 1 pupils admitted in 2001 from non-affiliated and affiliated schools, for the different courses.
10 % S4N Eligible for S5N: Percentage of Sec 4N pupils who were eligible for Sec 5N in the previous year's N-level examination.
11 High Value-added Schools: Tables 3-4 show the top 20 schools with high value-added performance for Special/Express and Normal courses respectively.
12 Fitness Level: The "Physical Fitness Percentage" in Table 5 gives the percentage of pupils who passed the National Physical Fitness Award test. The NAPFA test consists of 6 test items developed by the Sports Medicine and Research Centre of the Singapore Sports Council in 1981.
13 Percentage Overweight: The "Percentage Overweight" in Table 6 gives the percentage of pupils who are overweight by 20% or more according to standards provided by the Ministry of Health.
14 Fitness Index: In Table 7, the Fitness Index (FI) of each school is based on the height and weight measurements of its pupils and their performance in the NAPFA test. The FI is defined as the average of:
| (i) | the percentage of pupils within the acceptable weight range according to the Weight for Height Table compiled by School Health Service, and | |
| (ii) | the percentage of pupils who pass the NAPFA test. |
The acceptable weight range is from 80% to below 120% of standard weight.
15 The press release will also be available at the website: http://www1.moe.edu.sg/esd/ranking.htm.
|
Table 8: SAA 2001 Winning Schools (Secondary) |
| No |
School |
Arts | Sports | Uniformed Group | Academic Value-added | Physical Fitness |
| 1 | Anderson Sec |
Ö * |
Ö * | |||
| 2 | Anglican High | Ö * | Ö * | |||
| 3 | ACS (Barker Road) | Ö | ||||
| 4 | ACS (Independent) | Ö * | Ö * | |||
| 5 | Boon Lay Sec | Ö * | ||||
| 6 | Braddell - Westlake Sec | Ö * | ||||
| 7 | Bukit Panjang Govt. High | Ö * | ||||
| 8 | Catholic High | Ö * | ||||
| 9 | Cedar Girls' Sec |
Ö |
Ö |
|||
| 10 | CHIJ Katong Covent | Ö * | ||||
| 11 | CHIJ St. Nicholas Girls' | Ö | Ö * | |||
| 12 | Chung Cheng High (Main) | Ö * | Ö * | |||
| 13 | Clementi Town Sec | Ö * | ||||
| 14 | Crescent Girls' | Ö | ||||
| 15 | Dunman High | Ö * | ||||
| 16 | Dunman Sec | Ö * | ||||
| 17 | Gan Eng Seng Sec | Ö * | ||||
| 18 | Hong Kah Sec | Ö | ||||
| 19 | Mayflower Sec | Ö | ||||
| 20 | Methodist Girls' (Sec) | Ö * | Ö * | |||
| 21 | Nanyang Girls' High | Ö * | Ö * | |||
| 22 | New Town Sec | Ö | ||||
| 23 | Paya Lebar Methodist Girls' | Ö * | ||||
| 24 | Presbyterian High | Ö | ||||
| 25 | Queensway Sec | Ö | ||||
| 26 | Raffles Girls' | Ö * | ||||
| 27 | Raffles Institution | Ö * | Ö * | |||
| 28 | River Valley High | Ö * | Ö * | |||
| 29 | Singapore Chinese Girls' | Ö * | ||||
| 30 | St. Anthony's Canossian | Ö * | ||||
| 31 | St. Joseph's Institution | Ö * | ||||
| 32 | Tanjong Katong Girls' | Ö * | ||||
| 33 | Tanjong Katong Sec | Ö * | ||||
| 34 | Temasek Sec | Ö | ||||
| 35 | The Chinese High | Ö * | Ö * | Ö * | ||
| 36 | Victoria Sec | Ö * | ||||
| 37 | Xinmin Sec | Ö * | ||||
| 38 | Zhonghua Sec | Ö * | ||||
|
Total |
0 | 8 | 20 | 7 | 15 |
| Notes: | ||
| Ö * | = repeat winners | |
|
Table 9: 2001 Inaugural BPA Winning Schools |
| No | School |
Organisational Effectiveness |
Staff Well-being |
Teaching and Learning |
| 1 | ACS (Independent) | Ö | ||
| 2 | Paya Lebar Methodist Girls' (Sec) | Ö | ||
| 3 | Raffles Institution | Ö | Ö | |
| 4 | River Valley High | Ö | ||
| 5 | Xinmin Sec | Ö | Ö | |
|
Total |
1 | 2 | 4 |
INFORMATION SHEET ON BEST PRACTICE AWARD (BPA)
INTRODUCTION
1. The Ministry of Education's (MOE) Masterplan of Awards was instituted in late 1998. This system of award is implemented in tandem with the School Excellence Model (SEM) which is an organizational and self-assessment tool for schools. While the SEM provides a systematic framework for schools to work towards excellence, the Masterplan of Awards is a progressive framework to recognize schools for their efforts.
2. There are 3 levels of awards:
![]() |
| a. |
The Achievement Award (AA) gives recognition to schools for achievement in a single year. |
|
| b. |
The Sustained Achievement Award (SAA) gives recognition to schools for sustained achievement in academic and non-academic areas over a number of years, while the Best Practice Award (BPA) gives recognition to schools with effective practices and systems that lead to desirable educational outcomes. |
|
| c. |
At the apex of the award framework is the School Excellence Award (SEA) which gives recognition to schools for overall excellence in both processes and results. |
3. AAs are not new to schools. The SAAs were first given out in 1999. This year, the first BPAs will be given out. As the SEM is newly implemented, they are not ready for the SEA.
BPA CATEGORIES
4. There are four categories of BPA.
| a) b) c) d) |
Organisational Effectiveness Student All-round Development Staff Well-being Teaching and Learning |
5. The categories represent MOE's expectations of schools and reflect the key areas of the SEM. They focus on key processes involving the 3 key levels of people in a school - the school leadership, teachers and the students, and reflect significantly the three SEM core values underlying people management : Leading with Purpose, Students First and Teachers the Key. The practices expected in the four BPA categories underscore the translation of MOE's Thinking Schools Learning Nation (TSLN) vision and ability-driven paradigm in schools.
| a) |
BPA for Organisational Effectiveness gives recognition to a school that is very well managed for successful delivery of the Desired Outcomes of Education. The school culture is open and nurturing and the school environment is learner-centred. School strategies and plans are consonant with the TSLN vision and the ability-driven paradigm. The school is responsive to staff and student needs and works effectively with other stakeholders to bring about holistic education. Operationally, the school demonstrates administrative excellence in the way it manages and optimises resources.
|
|
| b) |
BPA for Student All-round Development gives recognition to a school that strongly demonstrates care and concern for its students through its implementation of holistic and ability-driven programmes. Pastoral care is a distinctive feature of the school culture. In the learner-centred environment, resources are well deployed to enhance students' all-round development. Students benefit from the inculcation of values and thinking skills in the formal and informal curriculum.
|
|
| c) |
BPA for Staff Well-being gives recognition to a school where teachers are effectively managed, developed and cared for. Teachers' creativity and energy are harnessed. They are confident, committed and professional. The school's work culture and environment enable teachers to manage stress and health well. Teachers have a strong sense of purpose as well as ownership of school programmes. In all, the school's efforts in this area significantly contribute to one of MOE's strategic thrusts, that of 'Building a Quality Teaching Service'.
|
|
| d) |
BPA for Teaching and Learning gives recognition to a school with distinctive quality of teaching and learning. Teachers are skilful and able to cater for students' learning style and pace. Pupils are highly motivated and demonstrate successful learning in the formal and non-formal curriculum. Teachers and pupils show enthusiasm for what they do and enjoy teaching and learning. Innovation takes centre-stage in the school's teaching and learning environment. Risk-taking and innovation in teaching and learning processes are clearly evident. |
FORM OF AWARD
6. Like the SAA, the BPA will be given in the form of a plaque with no monetary incentive. The value of the award is in the prestige that accompanies it and winning schools will be allowed to use the BPA logo as a mark of excellence. The BPA will be given out to winning schools together with the SAA at the annual MOE Workplan Seminar in September 2001.
Dated 10 August 2001
|
1 There is no change in the ranking criteria. Secondary Schools are ranked based on L1B5 for Special/Express course and L1B4 for Normal course. These criteria are explained in Appendix 1. Data on schools, which perform well in physical fitness, are also provided. |
|
|
2 PSLE Scores are after adding the bonus points. Up to three bonus points can be used to apply for Secondary 1 places. |
|
Page Last Updated : 08-Sep-2004 This site is best viewed with IE ver 5.x and Netscape ver 7.x Copyright 2004 Ministry of Education. All rights reserved. Privacy Statement | Terms of Use |