Home > Media Centre > Press Releases Printer-friendly page  

EDUN N25-02-033

03401

10 August 2001

 

PERFORMANCE INDICATORS, SUSTAINED ACHIEVEMENT AWARDS and BEST PRACTICE AWARDS FOR SECONDARY SCHOOLS 2001

 

1.      As in previous years, the Ministry of Education is providing information on the performance of Secondary Schools to help pupils and their parents make informed choices when opting for Secondary Schools. The performance indicators for Secondary Schools highlight the top-ranking schools in the General Certificate of Education (GCE) 'O' Level Examination, both in terms of absolute as well as value-added performance1. The schools awarded The Sustained Achievement Awards and The Best Practice Awards are also highlighted.

Top Schools based on Absolute Performance

2.      In the Special/Express course category, the top five schools were Raffles Institution, Raffles Girls' (Sec), Nanyang Girls' High, The Chinese High and Dunman High. The best non-Independent and non-Autonomous schools were Tanjong Katong Secondary, ranked 25th, Paya Lebar Methodist Girls’, ranked 26th and Ngee Ann Secondary, ranked 27th.

3.      For the Normal course, the top five Secondary Schools were Clementi Town Secondary, Xinmin Secondary, Ngee Ann Secondary, Presbyterian High and Anderson Secondary.

4.      The top schools in the 2000 GCE 'O' Level Examination are listed in Tables 1 and 2.

High Value-added Schools

5.      This year, CHIJ St. Theresa's Convent, Kuo Chuan Presbyterian Secondary, Ngee Ann Secondary, Paya Lebar Methodist Girls' Secondary, Queensway Secondary, St. Anthony's Canossian Secondary and Xinmin Secondary qualified for awards in both the Special/Express and Normal courses.

6.      The high value-added Secondary Schools are shown in Tables 3 and 4. These schools have helped their pupils perform better than expected based on their PSLE scores. The Ministry will award $20,000 to each of the top 10 schools and $10,000 to each of the next 10 schools in recognition of their good efforts.

Top Schools in Fitness

7.      Based on the composite Fitness Index, the top 5 schools in 2000 were CHIJ St. Nicholas Girls', Raffles Girls' (Secondary), Singapore Chinese Girls' School, Cedar Girls' Secondary and Nanyang Girls' High.

8.      The top 50 schools in terms of pupils' physical fitness, lowest percentage overweight and Fitness Index are shown in Tables 5, 6 and 7. These indicators are based on all pupils in the school and not just those in the graduating classes.

Sustained Achievement Awards (SAAs)

9.      The Sustained Achievement Awards (SAAs) gives recognition to schools that have performed well consistently over a period of years, in academic and non-academic areas.

10.    This year, a total of 50 SAAs, 8 for Sports, 20 for Uniformed Group, 7 for Academic Value-added and 15 for Physical Fitness, will be given out to 38 Secondary Schools. This is an increase of 4 awards and 9 schools over the previous year.

11.     Of the winning schools this year, 9 will receive the SAA for the first time. They are Anglo-Chinese (Barker Road) for Sports, Cedar Girls' Secondary, Crescent Girls', Hong Kah Secondary, New Town Secondary and Presbyterian High for Uniformed  Group activities, Queensway Secondary for Academic Value-added performance, Cedar  Girls' Secondary, Crescent Girls', Mayflower Secondary and Temasek Secondary for Physical Fitness.The details are given in Table 8.

Best Practice Awards (BPAs)

12.     This year, the Ministry of Education will be giving out the Best Practice Awards for the first time. The Best Practice Awards (BPAs) give recognition to schools with effective practices and systems that lead to desirable educational outcomes, academic or otherwise. The awards are part of the implementation of the School Excellence Model which provides a holistic approach to managing education with equal emphasis on processes as well as results.

13.     There are 4 categories of BPA. They represent the Ministry of Education's expectations of schools and reflect the key areas in the School Excellence Model (refer to Information Sheet on BPA). They are:

a) Organisational Effectiveness
b) Student All-round Development
c) Staff Well-being
d) Teaching and Learning

14.     This year, 5 Secondary Schools will receive 7 BPAs. They are Anglo-Chinese (Independent), Paya Lebar Methodist Girls' Secondary, Raffles Institution, River Valley High and Xinmin Secondary. The details are given in Table 9.

 

Table 1: Top 50 Schools for Special/Express Course
(Based on 2000 GCE O-Level Results)

Rank

SCHOOL

2000 GCE O-LEVEL RESULTS

PSLE SCORES OF 2001
SEC 1 INTAKE2

No. of Pupils Mean L1B5 Mean Subject
Grade
%
Passed 5 O-Levels or More
From Non-Affiliated Schools From Affiliated Schools
Special Course Express Course Special Course Express Course
1 Raffles Institution 463  7.9 1.6 100   261-286    
2  Raffles Girls'   (Secondary)  470  8.3 1.8  100   266-288    
3 Nanyang Girls' High  308 8.6 1.7 100 262-286   251-267 249-252
4 The Chinese High 479 9.0 1.9  100 261-287      
5 Dunman High 406 9.6 2.0 100 259-288       
6 River Valley High 439  10.0 2.1 100 255-281      
7 CHIJ St. Nicholas Girls' 375  10.1 2.1 100 258-286   251-269 222-252
8 Methodist Girls'   (Secondary)  276 10.9 2.2 100   256-274   202-283
8 Singapore Chinese Girls' 241 10.9 2.2 100   256-277   202-277
10 Anglo-Chinese (Independent) 437 11.5 2.3   100   247-270   240-280
11 Anderson Secondary 246 12.0 2.3 100   253-275     
12 Cedar Girls' Secondary  358 12.2 2.5 99   241-273    
12 Victoria 352 12.2   2.4  100   243-280    
14  Tanjong Katong Girls'i 350 12.4 2.4 99   238-268    
15 Bukit Panjang Govt. High  260 12.7 2.5 100   246-267     
16 St. Joseph's Institution 383 12.8 2.5 100   239-269   228-271
17 Crescent Girls' 346 13.1 2.5 99   236-271    
17 Xinmin Secondary 214 13.1 2.4 100   237-261    
19 Commonwealth Secondary 204 13.2 2.5 98   241-267    
19 Zhonghua Secondary 140 13.2 2.5 99   241-256    
21 Anglican High 372 13.3 2.6 99 251-277      
22 Catholic High 340 13.5 2.7 99 250-268 242-252  250-272 224-251
23 Chung Cheng High (Main) 360 13.8 2.7 99 250-264 241-252     
24 Temasek Secondary 230 13.9 2.6  100   241-276    
25 Tanjong Katong Secondary 332 14.3 2.6 99   231-270    
26 Paya Lebar Methodist Girls' Secondary 228 14.4 2.8 99       195-271
27 Maris Stella High 291 15.2  2.9 98 250-260 224-251 250-265 224-250
27 Ngee Ann Secondary 258  15.2 2.9 95   235-265   188-260
29 Nan Hua Secondary 163 15.3 2.8 99 250-272 243-252     
30 Ang Mo Kio Secondary 194 15.4 3.0 96   233-252    
31 CHIJ Secondary (Toa Payoh) 307 16.1 3.1 96   247-260   188-258
32 Clementi Town Secondary 188 16.2 3.0 97   232-255    
33 Fairfield Methodist Secondary 216 16.4 3.1 96   237-254   189-264
34 St. Andrew's Secondary 211 16.5 3.0 98   230-245   188-283
35 Swiss Cottage Secondary  233 16.8 3.2 96     238-264    
36 Dunman Secondary 228 17.4 3.2 94   232-267    
37 Ahmad Ibrahim Secondary 266 17.5 3.3 93   237-256    
38 St. Anthony's Canossian Secondary 202 18.0 3.3 95   235-247   188-265
39 CHIJ Katong Convent 149 18.1 3.6 95       195-260
39 Geylang Methodist Secondary 205 18.1 3.2 95   226-259   188-244
41 Presbyterian High 198 18.2 3.3 95   228-262    
42 Gan Eng Seng 181 18.4 3.4 95   228-258    
42 Kuo Chuan Presbyterian Secondary 128 18.4 3.3 95   228-247   189-248
42 St. Margaret's Secondary  132 18.4 3.3 92   235-255   188-251
45 Montfort Secondary 154 18.5 3.5 92       188-262
45 St. Gabriel's Secondary 162 18.5 3.3 94   231-238    188-241
47 CHIJ St. Theresa's Convent 190  18.6 3.4 93   211-239   189-233
48 Beatty Secondary 209 19.0 3.4 93   224-251    
48 Jurong Secondary 238 19.0 3.5 95   225-249    
50 Bukit Batok Secondary 206 19.2 3.5 95   224-257     


Table 2: Top 40 Schools for Normal Course
(Based on 2000 GCE O-Level Results)

Rank

SCHOOL

2000 GCE O-LEVEL RESULTS

% S4N Eligible for S5N

PSLE SCORES OF 2001 SEC 1 INTAKE

No. of Pupils Mean L1B4 Mean Subject Grade % Passed
5 O-Levels or More
  % Passed 3 O-Levels or More From Non- Affiliated Schools From Affiliated Schools
1 Clementi Town Secondary 53 18.4 4.2 72 96 88 178-199  
1  Xinmin Secondary 65 18.4 4.0 86 98 97 184-198  
3 Ngee Ann Secondary 100 20.6 4.5 63 91 93 186-198

152-187

4 Presbyterian High 63 20.7 4.5 60 94 76 171-189  
5 Anderson Secondary 40 21.0 4.7 65 80 100 186-198  
6 Paya Lebar Methodist Girls' Secondary 43 21.3 4.9 84 93 100   171-196
7 Nan Hua Secondary 59 21.4 4.6 66 92 82    
8  Kuo Chuan Presbyterian Secondary 52 22.2 4.8 67 88 84 183-197 152-187
8 St. Anthony's Canossian Secondary 65 22.2 4.9 71 89 92   152-187
10 Boon Lay Secondary 96 22.4 4.9 59 88 89 172-187  
11 Holy Innocents' High 84 22.5 4.8 51 89 98 179-198 160-187
12 Geylang Methodist Secondary 72 22.8 4.8 54 88 91 185-187 152-186
13 CHIJ St. Theresa's Convent 67 23.0  5.1 66 85 97 173-194 153-187
14 Dunman Secondary 110  23.1 5.2 60 83 93 185-199  
15 Bukit View Secondary 41 23.4 5.1 37 88 81 155-187  
15 Yishun Town Secondary 64 23.4 4.9 56 81 81 176-193  
17 Ang Mo Kio Secondary 62 23.5 5.1 56 87 88 172-193  
18 Beatty Secondary 90 23.7 5.0 53 86 78 177-196  
18 Mayflower Secondary 47 23.7 5.2 55 91 82 176-196  
20 Damai Secondary 67 23.8 5.2 55 82 86 179-195  
20 Kranji Secondary  71 23.8 5.2 51 80 69 178-194  
22 Manjusri Secondary 58 23.9  5.2 50 78 81 156-186 152-184
23 Bedok View Secondary 66 24.2 5.2 47 80 87 174-187  
23 Chung Cheng High (Branch) 63 24.2 5.2 49 83 91 168-187  
25 Hai Sing Catholic 96 24.3 5.3 50 82 83 180-198  
26 Serangoon Garden Secondary 80 24.5 5.2 49 83 67 152-184  
27 St Patrick's 59 24.6 5.3 29 90 86   153-187
28 Peicai Secondary 62 24.7 5.4 50 68 77 163-185   
29 Macpherson Secondary 61 24.8 5.3 38 85 78 152-187  
29 St. Andrew's Secondary 65 24.8 5.4 45 77 82 182-198 152-187
31 Jurong Secondary 90 24.9 5.3 51 84 87 178-198  
32 Queensway Secondary 60 25.0 5.3 38 88 75 166-187  
32 Yio Chu Kang Secondary 45 25.0 5.3 42 82 52 152-182  
34 Bukit Batok Secondary 112 25.1 5.3 42 76 76 172-194   
34 Deyi Secondary 85 25.1 5.4 44 75 85 169-187  
34 Woodsville Secondary 53 25.1 5.6 42 83 89 152-184  
37 Guangyang Secondary 57 25.2 5.4 39 75 75 153-187  
37 Pasir Ris Secondary 107 25.2 5.3 41 73 87 178-188  
37 Riverside Secondary  87 25.2 5.3 46 76 76 172-192  
40 Gan Eng Seng 66 25.4 5.4 35 82 83 180-199  
40 Woodlands Secondary 61 25.4 5.5 41 69 81 160-199  

 

Table 3: Top 20 Value-Added Secondary Schools for Special/Express Course
(Based on 2000 GCE O-Level Results)

   

SCHOOL

PSLE SCORES OF 2001
SEC 1 INTAKE

From Non-Affiliated Schools From
Affiliated
Schools

Top 10 Value-Added Schools
(In Alphabetical Order)

Bedok North Secondary 190-243  
CHIJ Katong Convent   195-260
CHIJ St. Theresa's Convent 211-239 189-233
First Toa Payoh Secondary 188-236  
Kuo Chuan Presbyterian Secondary 228-247 189-242
Methodist Girls' (Secondary) 256-274 202-283
Paya Lebar Methodist Girls' Secondary   195-271
Singapore Chinese Girls' 256-277 202-277
St. Anthony's Canossian Secondary 235-247 188-265
Xinmin Secondary 237-261  

Next Top 10
Value-Added Schools

(In Alphabetical Order)

Anglo-Chinese (Barker Road)   195-242
Bedok South Secondary 188-236  
Ngee Ann Secondary 235-265 188-260
Outram Secondary 195-234  
Queensway Secondary 203-236  
Serangoon Garden Technical 188-248  
St. Andrew's Secondary 230-245 188-283
St. Gabriel's Secondary 231-238 188-241
St. Margaret's Secondary 235-255 188-245
Tanjong Katong Secondary 231-270  

 

Table 4: Top 20 Value-Added Secondary Schools for Normal Course
(Based on 2000 GCE O-Level Results)

 

SCHOOL

PSLE SCORES OF 2001
SEC 1 INTAKE
From
Non-Affiliated Schools
From
Affiliated
Schools

Top 10
Value-Added Schools
(In Alphabetical Order)

Bukit View Secondary 155-187  
Clementi Town Secondary 178-199  
CHIJ St. Theresa's Convent 173-194 153-187
Kuo Chuan Presbyterian Secondary 183-197 152-187 
Nan Hua Secondary      
Ngee Ann Secondary 186-198 152-187
Paya Lebar Methodist Girls' Secondary   171-196
Presbyterian High 171-189  
St. Anthony's Canossian Secondary   152-187
Xinmin Secondary 184-198   

Next Top 10
Value-Added Schools

(In Alphabetical Order)

Anderson Secondary 186-198  
Boon Lay Secondary 172-187  
Bukit Batok Secondary 172-194  
Geylang Methodist Secondary 185-187 152-186
Holy Innocents' High 179-198 160-187
Kranji Secondary 178-194  
MacPherson Secondary 152-187  
Peicai Secondary 163-185   
Queensway Secondary 166-187  
Serangoon Garden Secondary 152-184  

                                          

Table 5: Top 50 Schools By Physical Fitness Level In 2000

S/No

School

Percentage with Awards
1 CHIJ St. Nicholas Girls' School 99.2
2 Singapore Chinese Girls' School 98.1
3 Nanyang Girls' High School 96.1
4 Cedar Girls' Secondary School 95.6
5 Tanjong Katong Girls' School 95.5
6 Raffles Girls' School (Secondary) 95.3
7 Crescent Girls' School 95.0
8 CHIJ St. Joseph's Convent 92.4
9 Dunman High School 90.9
10 Methodist Girls' School (Secondary) 90.7
11 Evergreen Secondary School 89.5
11 Anglican High School 89.5
13 Fuhua Secondary School  89.1
14 Commonwealth Secondary School 88.4
15 Anderson Secondary School 86.8
16 Temasek Secondary School 86.4
17 Serangoon Garden Technical School 86.0
18 New Town Secondary School 85.6
19 Kranji Secondary School 85.4
20  Hai Sing Catholic School 84.6
20  St. Anthony's Canossian Secondary School 84.6
22 Holy Innocents' High School  84.5
22 Balestier Hill Secondary School 84.5
24 Bukit Panjang Govt. High School 84.3
25 Mayflower Secondary School 84.1
25 Nan Chiau High School 84.1
25 Queenstown Secondary School  84.1
28 First Toa Payoh Secondary School 84.0
29 CHIJ St. Theresa's Convent 83.7
30 CHIJ Katong Convent 83.6
31 Orchid Park Secondary School 83.4
32 Yuying Secondary School 83.2
32 Jurong Secondary School 83.2
34 Northbrooks Secondary School 83.1
35 Thomson Secondary School 83.0
36 Pasir Ris Crest Secondary School 82.9
37 Woodgrove Secondary School 82.8
38 Bukit View Secondary School 82.1
39 Chung Cheng High School (Main) 81.8
40 Woodlands Secondary School 81.5
40 Raffles Institution 81.5
42 Anglo-Chinese School (Barker Road) 81.1
43 Queensway Secondary School 80.9
44 Compassvale Secondary School 80.8
45 Xinmin Secondary School 80.4
46 River Valley High School 80.0
46 Rangoon Secondary School 80.0
48 Paya Lebar Methodist Girls' Secondary School  79.9
49 Bedok North Secondary School 79.7
50 Shuqun Secondary School 79.6

 

Table 6: The 50 Schools With Lowest Percentage Overweight in 2000

S/No Name

Percentage Overweight

1 Dunman High School  5.5
2 Crescent Girls' School 5.9
2 Nanyang Girls' High School 5.9
4 Cedar Girls' Secondary School 6.2
5 Mayflower Secondary School 6.4
6 Anglican High School 6.6
7 Bukit Panjang Govt. High School 6.7
8 River Valley High School 6.9
9 Raffles Institution 7.1
10 Rangoon Secondary School 7.4
10 Tanjong Katong Girls' School 7.4
12 CHIJ St. Nicholas Girls' School  7.5
12 Victoria School 7.5
12 Upper Serangoon Secondary School  7.5
15 Temasek Secondary School 7.6
15 Zhonghua Secondary School 7.6
17 Fuhua Secondary School 7.7
18 Queenstown Secondary School 7.8
18 Anglo-Chinese School (Independent) 7.8
18 The Chinese High School 7.8
18  Serangoon Garden Technical School 7.8
18 Singapore Chinese Girls' School 7.8
18 Canberra Secondary School 7.8
24 Chung Cheng High School (Main) 7.9
24 Anderson Secondary School 7.9
24 Evergreen Secondary School 7.9
24 Holy Innocents' High School  7.9
28 Methodist Girls' School (Secondary) 8.0
28 New Town Secondary School 8.0
30 Nan Hua Secondary School 8.2
31 Raffles Girls' School (Secondary) 8.4
31 Pei Dao Secondary School 8.4
33 Ngee Ann Secondary School 8.6
33 Delta Secondary School 8.6
35 Thomson Secondary School 8.7
36 Kuo Chuan Presbyterian Secondary School 8.8
37 Northland Secondary School 8.9
38 Yuying Secondary School 9.0
39 Fairfield Methodist Secondary School 9.3
39 Tanjong Katong Secondary School 9.3
39 Catholic High School 9.3
42 Teck Whye Secondary School 9.4
42 St. Hilda's Secondary School 9.4
42 Dunman Secondary School 9.4
45  Xinmin Secondary School 9.5
46 Greenview Secondary School 9.6
47 Whitley Secondary School 9.7
47 Hua Yi Secondary School 9.7
47 Fajar Secondary School 9.7
47 Pioneer Secondary School 9.7

 

Table 7: Top 50 Schools By Fitness Index in 2000

S/No

Name

Fitness Index

1

CHIJ St. Nicholas Girls' School

94.5
2 Raffles Girls' School (Secondary) 92.2
2 Singapore Chinese Girls' School 92.2
4 Cedar Girls' Secondary School 92.0
5  Nanyang Girls' High School 91.9
6 Crescent Girls' School 91.0
7 Tanjong Katong Girls' School 90.9
8 Methodist Girls' School (Secondary) 89.8
9 Dunman High School 89.7
10 Fuhua Secondary School 88.1
11 Evergreen Secondary School 88.0
12 CHIJ St. Joseph's Convent 87.6
13 Bukit Panjang Govt. High School 86.9
13 Anglican High School 86.9
15 Temasek Secondary School 86.8
16 Mayflower Secondary School 86.6
17 Serangoon Garden Technical School 86.4
18 New Town Secondary School 85.6
19 St. Anthony's Canossian Secondary School 85.4
20 First Toa Payoh Secondary School 85.1
21 Anderson Secondary School 85.0
22 Chung Cheng High School (Main) 84.6
23 Holy Innocents' High School 84.5
24 Rangoon Secondary School 84.3
25 Queenstown Secondary School 84.2
25 Yuying Secondary School 84.2
27 River Valley High School  84.0
28 Commonwealth Secondary School 83.9
29 CHIJ Katong Convent 83.7
30 Raffles Institution 83.5
31 Balestier Hill Secondary School 83.4
32 Hai Sing Catholic School 83.2
32 CHIJ St. Theresa's Convent 83.2
34 Nan Chiau High School 83.0
35 Kranji Secondary School 82.9
36 Anglo-Chinese School (Independent) 82.8
36 Pei Dao Secondary School 82.8
38 Tanjong Katong Secondary School 82.4
39 Hua Yi Secondary School 82.1
40 Paya Lebar Methodist Girls' Secondary School 82.0
40 Yishun Town Secondary School 82.0
42 Woodlands Secondary School 81.9
43 The Chinese High School 81.8
44 Sembawang Secondary School 81.7
44 St. Margaret's Secondary School 81.7
46 CHIJ Secondary (Toa Payoh) 81.6
47 Shuqun Secondary School  81.3
48 Greenridge Secondary School 81.0
49 Bukit View Secondary School 80.9
49 Pasir Ris Crest Secondary School 80.9

 

APPENDIX

Explanatory Notes For Tables On Ranking Of Secondary Schools

1      The following seven tables provide information on the performance of selected Secondary Schools in the 2000 GCE O-level examination and the top schools in Physical Fitness, Lowest Percentage Overweight and Fitness Index.

Table 1:      Top 50 Schools (Special/Express Course)
Table 2:      Top 40 Schools (Normal Course)
Table 3:      Top 20 Value-Added Schools (Special/Express Course)
Table 4:      Top 20 Value-Added Schools (Normal Course)
Table 5:      Top 50 Secondary Schools by Physical Fitness Level
Table 6:      The 50 Secondary Schools with Lowest Percentage Overweight
Table 7:      Top 50 Secondary Schools by Fitness Index

 

2      For Tables 1-4, the performance of each school is based on pupils who took the O-level examination for the first time. Schools not included in the tables are those with small candidature (fewer than 40 pupils) or those closed in 2001. Not included in the ranking exercise are the following schools:

Schools With Small
Candidature
Anglo-Chinese (Barker Road) (Normal)
Balestier Hill Secondary (Normal)
Broadrick Secondary (Normal)
Bukit Merah Secondary (Normal)
Bukit Panjang Govt. High (Normal)
Buona Vista Secondary (Normal)
Chai Chee Secondary (Normal)
Chestnut Drive Secondary (Normal)
CHIJ Secondary (Toa Payoh) (Normal)
CHIJ Katong Convent (Normal)
CHIJ St. Joseph's Convent (Normal)
Christ Church Secondary (Express, Normal)

Commonwealth Secondary (Normal)
Fairfield Methodist Secondary (Normal)
Fajar Secondary (Normal)
First Toa Payoh Secondary (Normal)
Ghim Moh Secondary (Normal)
Nan Chiau High (Normal)
Outram Secondary (Normal)
Pei Dao Secondary (Normal)
Rangoon Secondary (Express, Normal)
Serangoon Garden Technical (Normal)
Shuqun Secondary (Normal)
Si Ling Secondary (Normal)
Siglap Secondary (Normal)
St. Margaret's Secondary (Normal)
St. Thomas Secondary (Normal)
Teck Whye Secondary (Normal)
Telok Kurau Secondary (Normal)
Temasek Secondary (Normal)
Thomson Secondary (Normal)
Upper Serangoon Secondary (Express)
Yuan Ching Secondary (Normal)
Yusof Ishak Secondary (Normal)
Zhonghua Secondary (Normal)
New Schools Without Any O-Level Candidates in 2000 Canberra Secondary
Compassvale Secondary
Coral Secondary
East Spring Secondary
Evergreen Secondary
Fuhua Secondary
Hua Yi Secondary
Junyuan Secondary
Kent Ridge Secondary
Marsiling Secondary
Northbrooks Secondary
Orchid Park Secondary
Pasir Ris Crest Secondary
Regent Secondary
Sembawang Secondary
Seng Kang Secondary
Unity Secondary
Westwood Secondary
Woodgrove Secondary
Woodlands Ring Secondary
Zhenghua Secondary
Schools Not Admitting Secondary 1 students in 2001 Christ Church Secondary
Schools Merged / Closed in 2001 Buona Vista Secondary
Rangoon Secondary
St. Thomas Secondary

 

Description of Terms Used in Tables

3      Number of Pupils: This column shows the number of pupils who took the O-level examination for the first time.

4      Mean L1B5: Mean of pupils' aggregate grades in L1 (English or Higher Mother Tongue language) and best 5 subjects. This is the ranking criterion for Special/Express course.

5      Mean L1B4: Mean of pupils' aggregate grades in English and best 4 subjects. This is the ranking criterion for Normal course.

6      Mean Subject Grade (MSG): Mean of all grades obtained by pupils in a school. This is the old ranking criterion for Special/Express and Normal course.

7      % Passed 5 O-Levels or More: Percentage of pupils with 5 O-level passes or more.

8      % Passes 3 O-Levels or More: Percentage of pupils with 3 O-level passes or more.

9      PSLE Scores of 2001 Sec 1 Intake: Aggregate scores of Sec 1 pupils admitted in 2001 from non-affiliated and affiliated schools, for the different courses.

10     % S4N Eligible for S5N: Percentage of Sec 4N pupils who were eligible for Sec 5N in the previous year's N-level examination.

11     High Value-added Schools: Tables 3-4 show the top 20 schools with high value-added performance for Special/Express and Normal courses respectively.

12     Fitness Level: The "Physical Fitness Percentage" in Table 5 gives the percentage of pupils who passed the National Physical Fitness Award test. The NAPFA test consists of 6 test items developed by the Sports Medicine and Research Centre of the Singapore Sports Council in 1981.

13     Percentage Overweight: The "Percentage Overweight" in Table 6 gives the percentage of pupils who are overweight by 20% or more according to standards provided by the Ministry of Health.

14     Fitness Index: In Table 7, the Fitness Index (FI) of each school is based on the height and weight measurements of its pupils and their performance in the NAPFA test. The FI is defined as the average of:

(i) the percentage of pupils within the acceptable weight range according to the Weight for Height Table compiled by School Health Service, and
(ii) the percentage of pupils who pass the NAPFA test.

 

          The acceptable weight range is from 80% to below 120% of standard weight.

15     The press release will also be available at the website: http://www1.moe.edu.sg/esd/ranking.htm.

 

Table 8: SAA 2001 Winning Schools (Secondary)

No

School

Arts Sports Uniformed Group Academic Value-added Physical Fitness
1 Anderson Sec    

Ö *

  Ö *
2 Anglican High     Ö *   Ö *
3  ACS (Barker Road)   Ö      
4 ACS (Independent)   Ö * Ö *    
5 Boon Lay Sec     Ö *    
6 Braddell - Westlake Sec     Ö *    
7 Bukit Panjang Govt. High         Ö *
8 Catholic High     Ö *    
9 Cedar Girls' Sec    

Ö

 

Ö

10 CHIJ Katong Covent       Ö *  
11 CHIJ St. Nicholas Girls'    Ö     Ö *
12 Chung Cheng High (Main)     Ö *   Ö *
13 Clementi Town Sec     Ö *    
14 Crescent Girls'         Ö
15 Dunman High         Ö *
16 Dunman Sec     Ö *    
17 Gan Eng Seng Sec     Ö *    
18 Hong Kah Sec     Ö    
19 Mayflower Sec         Ö
20 Methodist Girls' (Sec)   Ö *   Ö *  
21 Nanyang Girls' High   Ö *     Ö *
22 New Town Sec     Ö    
23 Paya Lebar Methodist Girls'       Ö *  
24 Presbyterian High     Ö    
25 Queensway Sec       Ö  
26 Raffles Girls'   Ö *      
27 Raffles Institution   Ö * Ö *    
28 River Valley High     Ö *   Ö *
29 Singapore Chinese Girls'       Ö *  
30 St. Anthony's Canossian       Ö *  
31 St. Joseph's Institution     Ö *    
32 Tanjong Katong Girls'         Ö *
33 Tanjong Katong Sec     Ö *    
34 Temasek Sec         Ö
35 The Chinese High   Ö * Ö *   Ö *
36 Victoria Sec     Ö *    
37 Xinmin Sec       Ö *  
38 Zhonghua Sec         Ö *
 

Total

0 8 20 7 15
Notes:
Ö * = repeat winners

 

Table 9: 2001 Inaugural BPA Winning Schools

No School

Organisational Effectiveness

Staff Well-being

Teaching and Learning

1 ACS (Independent)     Ö
2 Paya Lebar Methodist Girls' (Sec)   Ö  
3 Raffles Institution Ö   Ö
4 River Valley High     Ö
5 Xinmin Sec   Ö Ö
 

Total

1   2 4




INFORMATION SHEET ON BEST PRACTICE AWARD (BPA)

 

INTRODUCTION

1.      The Ministry of Education's (MOE) Masterplan of Awards was instituted in late 1998. This system of award is implemented in tandem with the School Excellence Model (SEM) which is an organizational and self-assessment tool for schools. While the SEM provides a systematic framework for schools to work towards excellence, the Masterplan of Awards is a progressive framework to recognize schools for their efforts.

2.      There are 3 levels of awards:

a.

The Achievement Award (AA) gives recognition to schools for achievement in a single year.

b.

The Sustained Achievement Award (SAA) gives recognition to schools for sustained achievement in academic and non-academic areas over a number of years, while the Best Practice Award (BPA) gives recognition to schools with effective practices and systems that lead to desirable educational outcomes.

c.

At the apex of the award framework is the School Excellence Award (SEA) which gives recognition to schools for overall excellence in both processes and results.

 

3.      AAs are not new to schools. The SAAs were first given out in 1999. This year, the first BPAs will be given out. As the SEM is newly implemented, they are not ready for the SEA.

BPA CATEGORIES

4.      There are four categories of BPA.

a)
b)
c) d)
Organisational Effectiveness
Student All-round Development
Staff Well-being
Teaching and Learning

5.      The categories represent MOE's expectations of schools and reflect the key areas of the SEM. They focus on key processes involving the 3 key levels of people in a school - the school leadership, teachers and the students, and reflect significantly the three SEM core values underlying people management : Leading with Purpose, Students First and Teachers the Key. The practices expected in the four BPA categories underscore the translation of MOE's Thinking Schools Learning Nation (TSLN) vision and ability-driven paradigm in schools.

a)

BPA for Organisational Effectiveness gives recognition to a school that is very well managed for successful delivery of the Desired Outcomes of Education. The school culture is open and nurturing and the school environment is learner-centred. School strategies and plans are consonant with the TSLN vision and the ability-driven paradigm. The school is responsive to staff and student needs and works effectively with other stakeholders to bring about holistic education. Operationally, the school demonstrates administrative excellence in the way it manages and optimises resources.

 

b)

BPA for Student All-round Development gives recognition to a school that strongly demonstrates care and concern for its students through its implementation of holistic and ability-driven programmes. Pastoral care is a distinctive feature of the school culture. In the learner-centred environment, resources are well deployed to enhance students' all-round development. Students benefit from the inculcation of values and thinking skills in the formal and informal curriculum.

 

c)

BPA for Staff Well-being gives recognition to a school where teachers are effectively managed, developed and cared for. Teachers' creativity and energy are harnessed. They are confident, committed and professional. The school's work culture and environment enable teachers to manage stress and health well. Teachers have a strong sense of purpose as well as ownership of school programmes. In all, the school's efforts in this area significantly contribute to one of MOE's strategic thrusts, that of 'Building a Quality Teaching Service'.

 

d)

BPA for Teaching and Learning gives recognition to a school with distinctive quality of teaching and learning. Teachers are skilful and able to cater for students' learning style and pace. Pupils are highly motivated and demonstrate successful learning in the formal and non-formal curriculum. Teachers and pupils show enthusiasm for what they do and enjoy teaching and learning. Innovation takes centre-stage in the school's teaching and learning environment. Risk-taking and innovation in teaching and learning processes are clearly evident.

 

FORM OF AWARD

6.      Like the SAA, the BPA will be given in the form of a plaque with no monetary incentive. The value of the award is in the prestige that accompanies it and winning schools will be allowed to use the BPA logo as a mark of excellence. The BPA will be given out to winning schools together with the SAA at the annual MOE Workplan Seminar in September 2001.

Dated 10 August 2001

 

1    There is no change in the ranking criteria. Secondary Schools are ranked based on L1B5 for Special/Express course and L1B4 for Normal course. These criteria are explained in Appendix 1. Data on schools, which perform well in physical fitness, are also provided.


2    PSLE Scores are after adding the bonus points. Up to three bonus points can be used to apply for Secondary 1 places.



 
 

Page Last Updated : 08-Sep-2004

This site is best viewed with IE ver 5.x and Netscape ver 7.x
Copyright 2004 Ministry of Education. All rights reserved.
Privacy Statement | Terms of Use